FALSE_POS_RATE95%+|ADOPTION68%|SWITCHING_INTENT30%|SAR_AUTO86 HEAT|SPEND_12MO+81%|AGENT_TRIAGE92 HEAT|LEGACY_SAT60/100|AI_NATIVE_SAT87/100|PROD_SCALE22%|SPEED_TO_SAR#2 DRIVER|
A
Arcana Research // Market Intelligence

Arcana Vertical Deep-Dive #1

AI Agents in AML

2025 Market Intelligence Report

How financial institutions are deploying AI agents for transaction monitoring, investigation automation, and SAR generation. Vendor displacement data, adoption signals, and practitioner intelligence.

214+

Respondents

Banking, Insurance, Fintech

Scope

March 2025

Published

by Arcana × Partner

Your Logo

01 — Market Brief

The Bottom Line

68%Pilot Purgatory

68% of financial institutions now use or pilot AI in AML — up from 41% in 2023. But only 22% have reached production scale. The market is stuck in pilot purgatory: high trial, low production.

95%+False Positive Rate

False positive reduction remains the #1 objective (74%). Speed to SAR is emerging as the #2 driver as real-time payment mandates accelerate. Yet average institutions still run 95%+ false positive rates on TM alerts.

3 tiersDisplacement Cycle

The market is consolidating around 3 tiers: legacy incumbents (NICE Actimize, SAS), modern platforms (Feedzai, Unit21), and AI-native upstarts (Sardine, Lucinity). Switching intent among legacy users is now 30%.

68%

Use or pilot AI in AML

+27pp vs 2023

74%

Cite false positive reduction as #1 goal

$1.2M

Avg. annual AML AI spend (mid-market)

+45% YoY

38%

Actively evaluating new vendors

81%

Expect AML AI spend to increase in 12mo

The Arcana View

The Centaur model — agent-assisted, human-approved — is the pragmatic path.

While every other enterprise function races to deploy autonomous AI agents, AML teams are stuck in the validation gap: regulators haven't blessed agentic workflows, model risk teams can't explain them, and compliance officers won't sign off. The vendors who crack the Centaur workflow — AI agents that triage, draft, and recommend while humans approve and file — will own the next decade of financial crime tech. Fully autonomous agents will hit AML last. That's the opportunity: build the explainability and audit infrastructure now. We're watching Unit21 and Lucinity most closely here.

02 — Adoption Signal

Where the Market Stands

AI in AML: Current Status

n=214 // Financial services practitioners

Production (broad)22%
Production (limited)18%
Pilot / testing28%
Evaluating18%
Not using AI in AML14%

68% have AI at some stage — but only 22% at broad production. Pilot purgatory.

Primary Objectives for AI in AML

"Why are you investing in AML AI?" (select all)

Implementation Model

42%

Primarily vendor solution(s)

31%

Mix of vendor + internal

18%

Primarily in-house

9%

SI-led (Accenture, TCS, etc.)

03 — The Displacement Cycle

Buy / Sell / Hold / Short

Peer-sourced performance data for the 6 most-cited AML AI vendors. Adoption rates, satisfaction scores, and switching intent from practitioners who actually use these tools.

Legacy IncumbentModern PlatformAI-Native Upstart

NICE Actimize

Legacy Incumbent

SELL

34%

Adoption

62

Satisfaction

28%

Switching

Strengths

Market shareRegulatory track recordFull suite

Weaknesses

Slow innovationExpensiveComplex deployment

Feedzai

Modern Platform

HOLD

22%

Adoption

78

Satisfaction

8%

Switching

Strengths

Real-time scoringML-nativeCloud-first

Weaknesses

Enterprise sales cycleLimited AML depth vs. fraud

Unit21

Modern Platform

BUY

16%

Adoption

82

Satisfaction

5%

Switching

Strengths

No-code rules + MLFast deploymentAPI-first

Weaknesses

Smaller scale customersLess regulatory pedigree

SAS

Legacy Incumbent

SHORT

28%

Adoption

58

Satisfaction

32%

Switching

Strengths

Deep analyticsRegulatory familiarityOn-prem option

Weaknesses

Dated UXSlow to adopt LLMsVendor lock-in

Sardine

AI-Native Upstart

BUY

8%

Adoption

85

Satisfaction

3%

Switching

Strengths

Device intelligenceFraud + AML unifiedFast onboarding

Weaknesses

Small install baseLess proven at scale

Lucinity

AI-Native Upstart

BUY

6%

Adoption

88

Satisfaction

2%

Switching

Strengths

AI copilot for investigatorsExplainability focusModern UX

Weaknesses

Early stageLimited US presenceNiche focus

04 — Capital Flow

Where the Money Goes

Annual AML AI Spend Distribution

Median: $1.2M/yr (mid-market financial institutions)

< $100K12%
$100K–$500K28%
$500K–$1M24%
$1M–$5M26%
$5M+10%

12-Month Spend Outlook

"How do you expect AML AI spend to change?"

Increase significantly
38%
Increase moderately
43%
Flat
12%
Decrease
4%
Unsure
3%

81%expect spend to increase in 12mo

05 — Heat Map

Technology Heat Index

Proprietary heat scores based on adoption velocity, investment intent, and practitioner excitement. Higher = faster adoption trajectory.

92

AI-powered alert triage

Mainstream

86

SAR narrative generation (LLM)

Rapid adoption

78

Network / entity resolution

Growing

72

Autonomous agent investigation

Early pilot

68

Real-time transaction scoring

Established

64

Sanctions screening AI

Growing

58

Synthetic identity detection

Emerging

42

Behavioral biometrics for AML

Niche

06 — Risk Register

What’s Holding Teams Back

WARNING: Regulatory uncertainty / model risk

Cited by 64% of respondents as a primary blocker

WARNING: Data quality & integration

Cited by 58% of respondents as a primary blocker

WARNING: Explainability / auditability

Cited by 52% of respondents as a primary blocker

Biggest Blockers to Deeper AI Adoption in AML

"What prevents you from doing more with AI in AML?"

Regulatory uncertainty / model risk64%
Data quality & integration58%
Explainability / auditability52%
Legacy system integration48%
Internal talent / expertise42%
Budget constraints28%

07 — The Dark Pool

Practitioner Intelligence

Anonymized field intelligence from survey respondents and Research tier members. What practitioners say when the vendors aren’t in the room.

CLASSIFIED2025-01-14 09:23:41 EST

"We built our own LLM pipeline for SAR narratives. Saved 40% of analyst time. But model risk won't let us auto-file — every narrative still gets human review."

Head of Financial Crime, T█p 10 █S B█nk

CLASSIFIED2025-02-03 14:17:08 EST

"Our legacy vendor wants $3M/yr for 'AI features' that are basically logistic regression with a new UI. We're piloting Unit21 on the side."

VP of Compliance Technology, R█g██n█l B█nk

CLASSIFIED2025-01-28 11:42:55 EST

"The real bottleneck isn't the AI — it's getting clean data out of our core banking system from 1997. No model can fix garbage in, garbage out."

Director of AML Operations, █ns█r█nc█ C█mp█ny

CLASSIFIED2025-02-11 16:05:22 EST

"Lucinity's copilot is the first AML tool my investigators actually like using. That matters more than any benchmark score."

BSA Officer, D█g█t█l B█nk

08 — Trade Ideas

Long / Short / Hedge

LONG

Unit21 / Lucinity

High satisfaction, low switching intent, strong upward trend

HIGH CONFIDENCE

SAR narrative automation

Fastest ROI, clearest regulatory path, 86 heat score

HIGH CONFIDENCE
SHORT

Legacy on-prem implementations

High cost, low agility, 30%+ switching intent

HIGH CONFIDENCE

Fully autonomous agent workflows

Regulatory uncertainty too high — pilot purgatory for 2+ years

MEDIUM CONFIDENCE
HEDGE

Keep SAS / Actimize for regulatory reporting

Maintain compliance continuity while running modern platform pilots

MEDIUM CONFIDENCE

API-wrappers for detection layer

Use modern ML via API overlay without ripping out core infrastructure

MEDIUM CONFIDENCE

Analyst Notes

1

Start with alert triage, not autonomous agents

Alert triage AI has the highest heat score (92) and the clearest regulatory path. Reduce false positives by 50-70% before attempting agentic workflows.

2

Pilot SAR narrative generation now

LLM-generated SAR narratives are the fastest ROI in AML AI. But keep human-in-the-loop — regulators aren't ready for auto-filing. The Centaur model wins here.

3

Evaluate modern platforms alongside incumbents

Switching intent among legacy vendor users is 30%. If you're in a renewal cycle with NICE Actimize or SAS, run a parallel evaluation with Unit21 or Feedzai.

4

Budget for 45%+ spend increase

81% of respondents expect AML AI spend to increase. The median mid-market institution spends $1.2M/yr — plan for $1.7M+ by 2026.

5

Invest in explainability infrastructure

The #1 blocker to deeper AI adoption is regulatory uncertainty around model explainability. Build audit trails and model documentation before you need them.

Methodology

This report is based on Arcana’s Q1 2025 Buyer Survey, with 214 respondents from banking, insurance, and fintech organizations. Respondents are VP+ level practitioners directly involved in AML technology decisions.

Vendor data is peer-sourced: adoption rates, satisfaction scores, and switching intent reflect what practitioners report, not vendor claims. Heat index scores are proprietary, calculated from adoption velocity, investment intent, and practitioner sentiment.

Supplemented with 12 structured interviews with AML practitioners at Research tier member organizations.

About This Report

This is a co-branded publication by Arcana and [Partner]. Arcana maintains full editorial independence. Partner branding does not influence methodology, data, or recommendations.

A

Arcana Research

arcana-advisors.com

Partner Logo

© 2025 Arcana Advisors. All rights reserved. This report contains proprietary data and analysis. Do not distribute without permission.